博客
关于我
强烈建议你试试无所不能的chatGPT,快点击我
Android 事件分发机制
阅读量:6983 次
发布时间:2019-06-27

本文共 15548 字,大约阅读时间需要 51 分钟。

转载自:http://blog.csdn.net/singwhatiwanna/article/details/17339857

概述

一直想写篇关于Android事件派发机制的文章,却一直没写。这两天刚好是周末。有时间了,想想写一篇吧。不然总是仅仅停留在会用的层次上可是无法了解其内部机制。

我用的是4.4源代码,打开看看,挺复杂的,尤其是事件是怎么从Activity派发出来的。太费解了。了解Windows消息机制的人会发现。认为Android的事件派发机制和Windows的消息派发机制挺像的,事实上这是一种典型的消息“冒泡”机制,非常多平台採用这个机制,消息最先到达最底层View,然后它先进行推断是不是它所须要的,否则就将消息传递给它的子View。这样一来,消息就从水底的气泡一样向上浮了一点距离。以此类推。气泡达到顶部和空气接触,破了(消息被处理了)。当然也有气泡浮出到顶层了。还没破(消息无人处理)。这个消息将由系统来处理。对于Android来说。会由Activity来处理。

Android点击事件的派发机制

1. 从Activity传递究竟层View

点击事件用MotionEvent来表示。当一个点击操作发生时,事件最先传递给当前Activity,由Activity的dispatchTouchEvent来进行事件派发,详细的工作是由Activity内部的Window来完毕的,Window会将事件传递给decor view,decor view一般就是当前界面的底层容器(即setContentView所设置的View的父容器),通过Activity.getWindow.getDecorView()能够获得。另外。看以下代码的的时候。主要看我凝视的地方。代码非常多非常复杂,我无法一一说明。可是我凝视的地方都是关键点,是博主细致读代码总结出来的。

源代码解读:

事件是由哪里传递给Activity的。这个我还不清楚。可是不要紧。我们从activity開始分析,已经足够我们了解它的内部实现了。

Code:Activity#dispatchTouchEvent

/**     * Called to process touch screen events.  You can override this to     * intercept all touch screen events before they are dispatched to the     * window.  Be sure to call this implementation for touch screen events     * that should be handled normally.     *      * @param ev The touch screen event.     *      * @return boolean Return true if this event was consumed.     */    public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {        if (ev.getAction() == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {            //这个函数事实上是个空函数。啥也没干,假设你没重写的话,不用关心            onUserInteraction();        }        //这里事件開始交给Activity所附属的Window进行派发,假设返回true。整个事件循环就结束了        //返回false意味着事件没人处理。全部人的onTouchEvent都返回了false,那么Activity就要来做最后的收场。        if (getWindow().superDispatchTouchEvent(ev)) {            return true;        }        //这里,Activity来收场了,Activity的onTouchEvent被调用        return onTouchEvent(ev);    }

Window是怎样将事件传递给ViewGroup的

Code:Window#superDispatchTouchEvent

/**     * Used by custom windows, such as Dialog, to pass the touch screen event     * further down the view hierarchy. Application developers should     * not need to implement or call this.     *     */    public abstract boolean superDispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event);
这居然是一个抽象函数,还注明了应用开发人员不要实现它或者调用它。这是什么情况?再看看例如以下类的说明,大意是说:这个类能够控制顶级View的外观和行为策略。并且还说这个类的唯一一个实现位于android.policy.PhoneWindow。当你要实例化这个Window类的时候。你并不知道它的细节,由于这个类会被重构,仅仅有一个工厂方法能够使用。

好吧。还是非常模糊啊,不太懂,只是我们能够看一下android.policy.PhoneWindow这个类。虽然实例化的时候此类会被重构,可是重构而已,功能是类似的。

Abstract base class for a top-level window look and behavior policy. An instance of this class should be used as the top-level view added to the window manager. It provides standard UI policies such as a background, title area, default key processing, etc.

The only existing implementation of this abstract class is android.policy.PhoneWindow, which you should instantiate when needing a Window. Eventually that class will be refactored and a factory method added for creating Window instances without knowing about a particular implementation. 

Code:PhoneWindow#superDispatchTouchEvent

@Override    public boolean superDispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {        return mDecor.superDispatchTouchEvent(event);    }
这个逻辑非常清晰了。PhoneWindow将事件传递给DecorView了。这个DecorView是啥呢,请看以下

private final class DecorView extends FrameLayout implements RootViewSurfaceTaker    // This is the top-level view of the window, containing the window decor.    private DecorView mDecor;    @Override    public final View getDecorView() {        if (mDecor == null) {            installDecor();        }        return mDecor;    }

顺便说一下。平时Window用的最多的就是((ViewGroup)getWindow().getDecorView().findViewById(android.R.id.content)).getChildAt(0)即通过Activity来得到内部的View。

这个mDecor显然就是getWindow().getDecorView()返回的View。而我们通过setContentView设置的View是它的一个子View。

眼下事件传递到了DecorView 这里。因为DecorView 继承自FrameLayout且是我们的父View。所以终于事件会传递给我们的View,原因先无论了。换句话来说,事件肯定会传递到我们的View,不然我们的应用怎样响应点击事件呢。

只是这不是我们的重点,重点是事件到了我们的View以后应该怎样传递。这是对我们更实用的。从这里開始。事件已经传递到我们的顶级View了,注意:顶级View实际上是最底层View,也叫根View。

2.底层View对事件的分发过程

点击事件究竟层View(通常是一个ViewGroup)以后,会调用ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvent方法,然后的逻辑是这种:假设底层ViewGroup拦截事件即onInterceptTouchEvent返回true。则事件由ViewGroup处理。这个时候。假设ViewGroup的mOnTouchListener被设置,则会onTouch会被调用,否则,onTouchEvent会被调用。也就是说,假设都提供的话,onTouch会屏蔽掉onTouchEvent。在onTouchEvent中。假设设置了mOnClickListener,则onClick会被调用。

假设顶层ViewGroup不拦截事件,则事件会传递给它的在点击事件链上的子View,这个时候,子View的dispatchTouchEvent会被调用。到此为止,事件已经从最底层View传递给了上一层View。接下来的行为和其底层View一致。如此循环,完毕整个事件派发。另外要说明的是,ViewGroup默认是不拦截点击事件的,其onInterceptTouchEvent返回false。

源代码解读:

Code:ViewGroup#dispatchTouchEvent

@Override    public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {        if (mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {            mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onTouchEvent(ev, 1);        }        boolean handled = false;        if (onFilterTouchEventForSecurity(ev)) {            final int action = ev.getAction();            final int actionMasked = action & MotionEvent.ACTION_MASK;            // Handle an initial down.            if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {                // Throw away all previous state when starting a new touch gesture.                // The framework may have dropped the up or cancel event for the previous gesture                // due to an app switch, ANR, or some other state change.                cancelAndClearTouchTargets(ev);                resetTouchState();            }            // Check for interception.            final boolean intercepted;            if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN                    || mFirstTouchTarget != null) {                final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;                if (!disallowIntercept) {		            //这里推断是否拦截点击事件,假设拦截。则intercepted=true                    intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);                    ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed                } else {                    intercepted = false;                }            } else {                // There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down                // so this view group continues to intercept touches.                intercepted = true;            }            // Check for cancelation.            final boolean canceled = resetCancelNextUpFlag(this)                    || actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL;            // Update list of touch targets for pointer down, if needed.            final boolean split = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_SPLIT_MOTION_EVENTS) != 0;            TouchTarget newTouchTarget = null;            boolean alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = false;	            //这里面一大堆是派发事件到子View,假设intercepted是true,则直接跳过            if (!canceled && !intercepted) {                if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN                        || (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_DOWN)                        || actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {                    final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex(); // always 0 for down                    final int idBitsToAssign = split ? 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex)                            : TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS;                    // Clean up earlier touch targets for this pointer id in case they                    // have become out of sync.                    removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToAssign);                    final int childrenCount = mChildrenCount;                    if (newTouchTarget == null && childrenCount != 0) {                        final float x = ev.getX(actionIndex);                        final float y = ev.getY(actionIndex);                        // Find a child that can receive the event.                        // Scan children from front to back.                        final View[] children = mChildren;                        final boolean customOrder = isChildrenDrawingOrderEnabled();                        for (int i = childrenCount - 1; i >= 0; i--) {                            final int childIndex = customOrder ?

getChildDrawingOrder(childrenCount, i) : i; final View child = children[childIndex]; if (!canViewReceivePointerEvents(child) || !isTransformedTouchPointInView(x, y, child, null)) { continue; } newTouchTarget = getTouchTarget(child); if (newTouchTarget != null) { // Child is already receiving touch within its bounds. // Give it the new pointer in addition to the ones it is handling. newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign; break; } resetCancelNextUpFlag(child); if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, false, child, idBitsToAssign)) { // Child wants to receive touch within its bounds. mLastTouchDownTime = ev.getDownTime(); mLastTouchDownIndex = childIndex; mLastTouchDownX = ev.getX(); mLastTouchDownY = ev.getY(); //注意以下两句。假设有子View处理了点击事件。则newTouchTarget会被赋值。 //同一时候alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget也会为true。这两个变量是直接影响以下的代码逻辑的。 newTouchTarget = addTouchTarget(child, idBitsToAssign); alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = true; break; } } } if (newTouchTarget == null && mFirstTouchTarget != null) { // Did not find a child to receive the event. // Assign the pointer to the least recently added target. newTouchTarget = mFirstTouchTarget; while (newTouchTarget.next != null) { newTouchTarget = newTouchTarget.next; } newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign; } } } // Dispatch to touch targets. //这里假设当前ViewGroup拦截了事件,或者其子View的onTouchEvent都返回了false。则事件会由ViewGroup处理 if (mFirstTouchTarget == null) { // No touch targets so treat this as an ordinary view. //这里就是ViewGroup对点击事件的处理 handled = dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, canceled, null, TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS); } else { // Dispatch to touch targets, excluding the new touch target if we already // dispatched to it. Cancel touch targets if necessary. TouchTarget predecessor = null; TouchTarget target = mFirstTouchTarget; while (target != null) { final TouchTarget next = target.next; if (alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget && target == newTouchTarget) { handled = true; } else { final boolean cancelChild = resetCancelNextUpFlag(target.child) || intercepted; if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, cancelChild, target.child, target.pointerIdBits)) { handled = true; } if (cancelChild) { if (predecessor == null) { mFirstTouchTarget = next; } else { predecessor.next = next; } target.recycle(); target = next; continue; } } predecessor = target; target = next; } } // Update list of touch targets for pointer up or cancel, if needed. if (canceled || actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP || actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) { resetTouchState(); } else if (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_UP) { final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex(); final int idBitsToRemove = 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex); removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToRemove); } } if (!handled && mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) { mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onUnhandledEvent(ev, 1); } return handled; }

以下再看ViewGroup对点击事件的处理

Code:ViewGroup#dispatchTransformedTouchEvent

/**     * Transforms a motion event into the coordinate space of a particular child view,     * filters out irrelevant pointer ids, and overrides its action if necessary.     * If child is null, assumes the MotionEvent will be sent to this ViewGroup instead.     */    private boolean dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(MotionEvent event, boolean cancel,            View child, int desiredPointerIdBits) {        final boolean handled;        // Canceling motions is a special case.  We don't need to perform any transformations        // or filtering.  The important part is the action, not the contents.        final int oldAction = event.getAction();        if (cancel || oldAction == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL) {            event.setAction(MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL);            if (child == null) {		        //这里就是ViewGroup对点击事件的处理,其调用了View的dispatchTouchEvent方法                handled = super.dispatchTouchEvent(event);            } else {                handled = child.dispatchTouchEvent(event);            }            event.setAction(oldAction);            return handled;        }        // Calculate the number of pointers to deliver.        final int oldPointerIdBits = event.getPointerIdBits();        final int newPointerIdBits = oldPointerIdBits & desiredPointerIdBits;        // If for some reason we ended up in an inconsistent state where it looks like we        // might produce a motion event with no pointers in it, then drop the event.        if (newPointerIdBits == 0) {            return false;        }        // If the number of pointers is the same and we don't need to perform any fancy        // irreversible transformations, then we can reuse the motion event for this        // dispatch as long as we are careful to revert any changes we make.        // Otherwise we need to make a copy.        final MotionEvent transformedEvent;        if (newPointerIdBits == oldPointerIdBits) {            if (child == null || child.hasIdentityMatrix()) {                if (child == null) {                    handled = super.dispatchTouchEvent(event);                } else {                    final float offsetX = mScrollX - child.mLeft;                    final float offsetY = mScrollY - child.mTop;                    event.offsetLocation(offsetX, offsetY);                    handled = child.dispatchTouchEvent(event);                    event.offsetLocation(-offsetX, -offsetY);                }                return handled;            }            transformedEvent = MotionEvent.obtain(event);        } else {            transformedEvent = event.split(newPointerIdBits);        }        // Perform any necessary transformations and dispatch.        if (child == null) {            handled = super.dispatchTouchEvent(transformedEvent);        } else {            final float offsetX = mScrollX - child.mLeft;            final float offsetY = mScrollY - child.mTop;            transformedEvent.offsetLocation(offsetX, offsetY);            if (! child.hasIdentityMatrix()) {                transformedEvent.transform(child.getInverseMatrix());            }            handled = child.dispatchTouchEvent(transformedEvent);        }        // Done.        transformedEvent.recycle();        return handled;    }
再看

Code:View#dispatchTouchEvent

/**     * Pass the touch screen motion event down to the target view, or this     * view if it is the target.     *     * @param event The motion event to be dispatched.     * @return True if the event was handled by the view, false otherwise.     */    public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {        if (mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {            mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onTouchEvent(event, 0);        }        if (onFilterTouchEventForSecurity(event)) {            //noinspection SimplifiableIfStatement            ListenerInfo li = mListenerInfo;            if (li != null && li.mOnTouchListener != null && (mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED                    && li.mOnTouchListener.onTouch(this, event)) {                return true;            }            if (onTouchEvent(event)) {                return true;            }        }        if (mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {            mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onUnhandledEvent(event, 0);        }        return false;    }
这段代码比較简单,View对事件的处理是这种:假设设置了OnTouchListener就调用onTouch,否则就直接调用onTouchEvent,而onClick是在onTouchEvent内部通过performClick触发的。简单来说。事件假设被ViewGroup拦截或者子View的onTouchEvent都返回了false,则事件终于由ViewGroup处理。

3.无人处理的点击事件

假设一个点击事件。子View的onTouchEvent返回了false,则父View的onTouchEvent会被直接调用,以此类推。假设全部的View都不处理,则终于会由Activity来处理。这个时候,Activity的onTouchEvent会被调用。

这个问题已经在1和2中做了说明。

你可能感兴趣的文章
《深入理解Scala》——第2章,第2.1节学习使用Scala交互模式(REPL)
查看>>
《21天学通HTML+CSS+JavaScript Web开发(第7版)》——1.7 作业
查看>>
【Android】用MediaRecorder录制视频太短崩的问题
查看>>
一个数组实现两个栈
查看>>
phonegap+jquerymobile开发android的心得(4)
查看>>
js获取url传递参数
查看>>
高德地图POI查找
查看>>
磁盘格式化
查看>>
Fedora 11 安装指南-12
查看>>
eclipse的安卓开发插件『ADT』在线安装不成功的解决方案
查看>>
刷屏的海底捞超级APP究竟是怎样与阿里云合作的
查看>>
k8s学习笔记之三:k8s快速入门
查看>>
SpringBoot慕课学习-SpringBoot开发常用技术整合
查看>>
C10K问题
查看>>
慕课网3-13编程练习:采用flex弹性布局制作页面主导航
查看>>
线程中死锁的demo
查看>>
canvas-7globleCompositeOperation.html
查看>>
英语发音规则---H字母
查看>>
UESTC 2014 Summer Training #11 Div.2
查看>>
1035. 插入与归并(25)
查看>>